Oligarchy: rule by the most vicious few over the more
innocent many; the default way of organizing societies.
There are in practice three kinds of government: naked oligarchies,
covert oligarchies, and non-oligarchies which tend to degenerate into
oligarchies. The explanation of why this is so has at least three levels, each
deeper and broader than the next. At the highest, most apparent level, there is
what Robert Michels called in 1911 the Iron Law of Oligarchy, which is that the
centralization of power is the most efficient way of organizing large
groups. Bureaucracies form as control needs to be specialized and delegated,
and as the bureaucracy grows, higher and higher levels of command need to be
put into place to avoid a regress to anarchy, whereupon those near the
pyramid’s apex tend either to be corrupted by the greater power they acquire or
to have been sufficiently vicious in advance to have successfully worked their
way to the top of the hierarchy, wining out against cut-throat competitors.
More broadly, the most stable social structure in species
whose members live in large groups, including birds, fish, and primates, is the
dominance hierarchy in which power is centralized in a minority of alpha
males or females who maintain a social order by rigorously enforcing rules of
which members enjoy such benefits as privileged access to food or to mates.
Oligarchy in human societies is just our form of the dominance hierarchy, which
is to say that the underlying structure of our myriad social systems is
naturally selected.
Deeper still, the inevitability of oligarchy and the
injustice entailed by any such gross inequality have Gnostic flavours,
revealing the existential, mythical status of our ultimate position within
nature as accursed, imprisoned beings too clever to maintain our peace of
mind. The undead god, which is the monstrous power of cosmic creativity, blindly
spits up creatures that are instinctively opposed to living alone, only to
create a second dead end for these social beings: when they huddle to escape
the anguish of loneliness, the majority who are relatively docile place
themselves in the clutches of oligarchs.
Where in the traditional definition of oligarchy does it say that the "few" must be "vicious"?
ReplyDeleteGood question. Note that I don't intend my Dictionary of Micro Rants to offer standard definitions. The goals are to summarize my longer articles on this blog and to concisely explain these topics, with a little satire thrown in for good measure (like in Bierce's Devil's Dictionary).
DeleteBut to your point, you're right that the word "oligarchy" isn't pejorative in that sense. However, my explanation of oligarchy combines three factors: the evolutionary dominance hierarchy, the Iron Law of Oligarchy, and the proverb that the greater the concentration of power, the greater the corruption. An oligarchy is when the minority rule the majority, which means that power is concentrated in relatively few hands. That concentration will corrupt the oligarchs, assuming they're not already corrupt or sociopathic for having climbed to the top of the dominance hierarchy.